Finite Difference Method Solver Calculator

Analyze diffusion, electrostatics, and heat equations with confidence. Tune meshes, sources, boundaries, and conductivity quickly. Get clear numerical profiles, gradients, plots, exports, and diagnostics.

Input Parameters

This solver models the one-dimensional steady equation d²φ/dx² = -S/k with fixed boundary values using a central-difference stencil.

Example Data Table

Case L (m) Nodes φ(0) φ(L) k S
Heated Rod1.009100300121500
Electrostatic Slab0.50110504200
Diffusion Channel2.00131.20.20.80.1

Formula Used

Governing equation: d²φ/dx² = -S/k
Interior node approximation: (φi-1 - 2φi + φi+1) / Δx² = -S/k
Rearranged linear form: -φi-1 + 2φi - φi+1 = (SΔx²)/k

The calculator discretizes the domain into equally spaced nodes. Dirichlet boundary values are enforced at both ends. The resulting tridiagonal matrix is solved with the Thomas algorithm, giving the nodal field values. Gradients are then estimated with forward, backward, and central differences.

How to Use This Calculator

  1. Enter the physical domain length and choose the total number of grid nodes.
  2. Set boundary values at the left and right ends of the domain.
  3. Provide the conductivity or diffusivity coefficient and a uniform source term.
  4. Optionally customize the field label and unit for the result table.
  5. Press Submit to place the computed result section above the form.
  6. Use the CSV button for tabular export and the PDF button for a printable report.

Article

Grid Resolution and Accuracy

Finite difference results improve as node count increases because spacing Δx becomes smaller and truncation error declines for the central second derivative. In practical rod or slab problems, moving from 9 nodes to 21 or 41 nodes can smooth curvature and reduce gradient scatter near boundary changes. Users should compare peak value, average value, and flux after each refinement step to confirm convergence.

Boundary Conditions and Their Role

This calculator applies fixed values at each end of the domain. If φ(0)=100 and φ(L)=300, those limits are enforced exactly, while interior nodes adjust to conductivity and source strength. A larger boundary difference raises slope magnitude. Equal boundary values remove the linear tilt and make the internal source term responsible for most of the curve shape.

Source Term and Curvature

The uniform source S controls whether the interior profile departs from a straight line. Positive generation adds curvature and can raise interior temperature or potential above linear interpolation. If S doubles while geometry and conductivity stay fixed, the right side of the algebraic system also doubles, so the discrete solution bends more and end fluxes shift accordingly.

Conductivity Effects

Conductivity k moderates the impact of the source term. Higher k spreads generation more efficiently, flattening the nodal profile. Lower k amplifies curvature and steepens gradients. For example, lowering k from 12 to 6 with identical inputs doubles the forcing term (SΔx²)/k, pushing the solution farther from the no-source linear profile.

Interpreting Flux and Gradient

The calculator estimates gradients at every node and computes left and right flux-style values from the end slopes. These outputs help evaluate transfer behavior at the boundaries. When the source is nonzero, the two boundary fluxes usually differ because the domain generates or consumes quantity internally. Pairing flux with average field value gives a stronger engineering check than reviewing nodal values alone.

Why the Tridiagonal System Is Efficient

Each interior node creates one equation, forming a tridiagonal matrix with nonzero terms only on three diagonals. The Thomas algorithm solves this structure in linear time, which makes mesh studies practical. Users can change domain length, node count, source level, and conductivity repeatedly while still getting a transparent numerical profile, export-ready table, and plot for review.

FAQs

1. What does this solver calculate?

It solves a one-dimensional steady boundary value problem using central finite differences, fixed end values, and a tridiagonal linear system for interior nodes.

2. Why does increasing node count matter?

More nodes reduce grid spacing, usually improving accuracy and revealing whether peak values, gradients, and fluxes are converging toward a stable numerical solution.

3. Can I use it for heat transfer and electrostatics?

Yes. The same mathematical form appears in conduction, diffusion, and electrostatic models when the problem can be written as a one-dimensional steady equation.

4. What happens if conductivity is very small?

A smaller conductivity magnifies the source-term effect, causing stronger curvature and steeper gradients. Extremely small values may also produce very large computed field values.

5. What do the left and right flux values show?

They summarize transfer behavior at both boundaries using the end gradients. Differences between them often reflect internal generation or absorption across the domain.

6. What is exported in CSV and PDF?

CSV exports the nodal results table. PDF captures the calculator page, including inputs, summary metrics, plot, table, example data, formulas, article, and FAQs.

Related Calculators

markov chain monte carlometropolis monte carlokinetic monte carlodiscrete element methodconjugate heat transferquantum monte carlomultibody dynamicsstiff ode solveradaptive mesh refinementparticle in cell

Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.