Model droplet and pore curvature to predict equilibrium vapor pressure accurately today. Choose units, solve for radius or temperature, then export reports easily fast.
Set your scenario, choose units, then compute or solve inversely.
The Kelvin equation connects curvature with equilibrium vapor pressure. It is commonly written using a pressure ratio:
Here, γ is surface tension, Vm is molar volume, r is radius, R is the gas constant, T is temperature, and θ is contact angle.
Example values (water-like, 25°C, γ=0.0728 N/m, Vm=18.07 cm³/mol, convex).
| Radius (nm) | ln(p/p0) | p/p0 | Equilibrium RH (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 0.5306651081 | 1.700062658 | 170.00627 |
| 5 | 0.2122660432 | 1.236476798 | 123.64768 |
| 10 | 0.1061330216 | 1.111969783 | 111.19698 |
| 20 | 0.05306651081 | 1.054499778 | 105.44998 |
The Kelvin equation quantifies how surface curvature shifts equilibrium vapor pressure relative to a flat interface. For a convex droplet, molecules at the surface experience a higher chemical potential, so the ratio p/p0 becomes greater than 1 as radius decreases. This explains why very small droplets evaporate more readily.
Geometry changes the sign. Convex curvature yields ln(p/p0) = +2γVm/(rRT). Concave curvature, typical of a meniscus in a pore, produces ln(p/p0) = −2γVmcos(θ)/(rRT). A wetting liquid (cosθ near 1) lowers p/p0 and promotes condensation in narrow pores.
Because ln(p/p0) scales with 1/r, nanoscale radii dominate the result. With water-like parameters near 298 K, reducing radius from 20 nm to 2 nm increases ln(p/p0) by an order of magnitude. This scaling matters in aerosols, pores, and condensation studies.
Temperature appears in the denominator as RT. Higher temperature reduces ln(p/p0) for the same γ, Vm, and r. In practice, γ and Vm may also vary with temperature, so careful work uses temperature-consistent property data rather than a single constant.
Surface tension sets the energetic cost of creating curved interface area. A larger γ increases |ln(p/p0)| linearly. Surfactants reduce γ and can dramatically weaken curvature effects, changing equilibrium humidity thresholds for condensation and altering droplet stability in sprays and emulsions.
Vm links pressure work to molecular volume in the condensed phase. For liquids, Vm can be approximated from density: Vm ≈ M/ρ. Small errors in Vm produce proportional errors in the exponent, so selecting a credible density at the working temperature improves reliability.
In concave mode, cos(θ) accounts for wetting. θ below 90° gives positive cos(θ), amplifying capillary condensation (p/p0 < 1). θ above 90° yields negative cos(θ) and can invert expectations. When θ is uncertain, it is useful to sweep values to bound the result.
Many workflows interpret p/p0 as equilibrium relative humidity fraction for water vapor at fixed temperature. The calculator reports RH (%) = 100·(p/p0) for convenience. For inverse problems, solving for radius or temperature helps design pore sizes, predict aerosol activation, and estimate where condensation begins in environmental control, drying, and nanoporous material design.
It is the equilibrium vapor pressure over a curved surface divided by the flat-surface vapor pressure at the same temperature. For water vapor, it often corresponds to the equilibrium relative humidity fraction.
Use concave for a meniscus inside a pore or capillary where curvature points inward. This case commonly predicts lower p/p0 and therefore capillary condensation at humidity below 100%.
Contact angle captures wetting. The factor cos(θ) modifies the curvature effect for pores. Better wetting (smaller θ) increases cos(θ) and strengthens condensation predictions.
Yes. In convex mode, small droplets typically yield p/p0 > 1, meaning higher equilibrium vapor pressure than a flat surface. This supports faster evaporation of tiny droplets.
Radius has the strongest influence because the exponent scales as 1/r. Surface tension and molar volume scale linearly, while temperature reduces the exponent magnitude through the RT term.
Accuracy depends on property data (γ, Vm, θ) and whether Kelvin theory is valid for your scale. At extremely small radii, molecular effects and non-idealities can require more advanced models.
Use Vm from reliable thermophysical tables at your temperature, or estimate Vm ≈ M/ρ using molar mass and liquid density. Consistent units are essential for meaningful results.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.