Model transformer coupling using inductances and mutual linkage. Compute M, k, or induced emf instantly. Compare coils, validate designs, and document calculations with exports.
Select what you want to compute, then enter known values. The calculator supports common unit scaling and shows a quick formula check.
Coupling coefficient: k = M / √(L1·L2)
Mutual inductance: M = k · √(L1·L2)
Induced voltage (magnitude): V = ± M · (dI/dt) using dot convention polarity.
All inductances are converted to Henry internally. Current slope is converted to A/s before computing voltage.
These examples illustrate typical coupling and induced voltage values.
| Case | L1 (mH) | L2 (mH) | M (mH) | k (—) | dI/dt (A/ms) | Induced V (V) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 12.0 | 8.0 | 2.6 | 0.265 | 3.0 | 7.8 |
| B | 25.0 | 25.0 | 15.0 | 0.600 | 1.2 | 18.0 |
| C | 3.3 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.314 | 8.0 | 5.6 |
Mutual inductance measures how strongly one coil’s changing current influences another coil. Higher coupling improves energy transfer in transformers and coupled inductors, while lower coupling increases leakage and stray fields. Designers use M to predict voltage pickup, crosstalk risk, and transferred power in compact assemblies.
The coupling coefficient k is dimensionless and normally falls between 0 and 1. Air‑core coils separated by distance often show k ≈ 0.05–0.30. Tightly wound windings on a closed ferrite core can reach k ≈ 0.90–0.99, depending on gaps and winding overlap.
This calculator uses M = k·√(L1·L2). Mutual inductance grows with the square‑root of the inductance product. If both L1 and L2 double, √(L1·L2) doubles, so M doubles when k stays constant. This helps compare coil changes quickly across prototypes.
Induced voltage follows V = ±M·(dI/dt). The slope is the key: faster switching produces larger emf. Example: M = 2 mH and dI/dt = 3 A/ms gives about 6 V (aiding). At 10 A/ms, it becomes about 20 V, which may require snubbers.
The sign depends on dot convention. When current enters a dotted terminal, the other coil’s dotted terminal becomes positive for aiding coupling. Swapping one winding’s terminals flips polarity and makes the induced voltage opposing. Use the polarity selector to model this sign choice during wiring checks.
Coupling also hints at leakage. A useful estimate is Lleak ≈ L·(1−k) for many practical cases. With k = 0.95, roughly 5% behaves like leakage. With k = 0.40, about 60% behaves like leakage, raising loss, ringing, and EMI exposure in nearby circuits.
In labs, measure L1 and L2 separately, then measure series‑aiding and series‑opposing inductance: L+ = L1 + L2 + 2M and L− = L1 + L2 − 2M. Then M = (L+ − L−)/4, and k follows from M, L1, and L2 at the same test frequency.
Use k to compare geometry, spacing, and core choices on one scale. Use M with worst‑case dI/dt to estimate voltage spikes and interference pickup. Exported results are helpful for design reviews, documentation, and tracking changes across prototype iterations, especially when multiple coil options are evaluated side by side.
It means most magnetic flux from one coil links the other. Energy transfer is strong, leakage inductance is small, and induced voltages are predictable. Values near 1 usually require a tight winding arrangement and a well‑designed magnetic path.
k above 1 is nonphysical. It almost always comes from unit mismatch, a decimal error, or mixing measured values taken under different conditions. Recheck L1, L2, and M units and confirm all values correspond to the same frequency and setup.
Yes. If you already know mutual inductance M and the current slope dI/dt, the tool can compute induced voltage directly. L1 and L2 are only needed when you want to derive M or k from coil inductances.
Use the unit that matches your data source. Many oscilloscopes and datasheets quote A/µs or A/ms. The calculator converts your input to A/s internally, so you can keep the numbers convenient while maintaining correct physics.
Use dot convention. If current enters a dotted terminal, the induced voltage is positive at the other coil’s dotted terminal for aiding. If you reverse one coil’s terminals or winding direction, the relationship becomes opposing and the sign flips.
Air‑core coils placed apart may be 0.05–0.30. Loosely coupled inductors can be 0.2–0.6. Well‑built transformers on closed ferrite or laminated cores often reach 0.90–0.99, depending on winding layout and core geometry.
Yes. Core materials can show frequency‑dependent permeability and losses, and measurement instruments may use different test conditions. For consistent results, measure L1, L2, and M at the same frequency and excitation level, then compute k from those matched values.
Use realistic coil values and consistent units for best results.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.