The calculator uses a common approximation for the change in radiative forcing caused by changing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration:
Delta F = k x ln(C / C0)
If you enable temperature response, the estimate is: Delta T = lambda x Delta F, where lambda is your chosen sensitivity (K per W/m2).
| Initial C0 (ppm) | Final C (ppm) | k | Delta F (W/m2) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 280 | 560 | 5.35 | about 3.708 | Classic CO2 doubling example. |
| 280 | 415 | 5.35 | about 2.113 | Preindustrial to modern baseline. |
| 415 | 450 | 5.35 | about 0.431 | Smaller scenario change example. |
Radiative forcing is a measure of how Earth’s energy balance shifts when atmospheric composition changes. A positive forcing means more energy is retained by the climate system, creating a warming influence. Because carbon dioxide absorbs infrared radiation, increasing its concentration produces a well-studied forcing response.
The calculator uses a logarithmic dependence: forcing scales with ln(C/C0). This means each additional ppm has a larger impact at lower concentrations than at higher concentrations. The coefficient k controls the magnitude of the forcing per natural-log unit.
A classic benchmark is a doubling of CO2. If C equals 2 × C0, then ln(C/C0) = ln(2), and the forcing becomes k × ln(2). With the commonly used k = 5.35, this evaluates to about 3.7 W/m2.
Many comparisons use a preindustrial baseline near 280 ppm. Using 415 ppm as an updated concentration and k = 5.35, the calculator returns a forcing near 2.11 W/m2. This highlights how large historical changes translate into measurable energy imbalance.
The coefficient k is often set to 5.35 for CO2 forcing estimates. Advanced users may test alternatives to match a preferred parameterization or study design. Changing k scales the forcing linearly while preserving the logarithmic structure.
If C is greater than C0, the ratio exceeds one and the natural log is positive, giving a positive forcing. If C is less than C0, forcing becomes negative, representing a cooling influence. Magnitude is best compared in W/m2 across scenarios.
The optional temperature estimate uses Delta T = lambda × Delta F. Here, lambda represents a simplified sensitivity in K per W/m2. For example, if lambda = 0.8 and Delta F = 2.11, the implied response is about 1.69 K, acknowledging this is a simplified diagnostic.
Start by selecting a consistent baseline, then run multiple future or historical values of C. Use the scenario table to compare outcomes side by side and export results for documentation. This approach supports quick sensitivity checks, teaching demonstrations, and reproducible reporting. For professional summaries, state that forcing is immediate, while temperature change depends on feedbacks, ocean heat uptake, and the chosen time horizon.
Use parts per million (ppm) for both C0 and C. The formula depends on the ratio, so both values must share the same units to remain consistent.
CO2 forcing increases approximately with the natural log of concentration because absorption bands saturate. The log form captures diminishing incremental forcing at higher concentrations.
If final CO2 is lower than the baseline, ln(C/C0) becomes negative and forcing is negative. That represents a cooling influence relative to the reference state.
5.35 is a widely used default for CO2 forcing estimates. Some studies use slightly different coefficients or forms, so the calculator lets you adjust k for your preferred method.
It is a simplified diagnostic using Delta T = lambda × Delta F. It does not replace full climate modeling, but it is useful for quick comparisons and sensitivity exploration.
Radiative forcing is primarily a climate-scale concept. Short-term weather responds to many factors, so use forcing for broader energy-balance and scenario analysis, not day-to-day forecasts.
Report C0, C, k, and the computed Delta F in W/m2. If you used lambda, include it and Delta T. Exporting CSV or PDF helps keep the calculation trail consistent.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.