Model wet deposition using flexible physics parameters today. Compare gases and particles under storms fast. Calculate scavenging quickly, export reports, and share insights anywhere.
| Scenario | Method | Inputs | Λ (1/hr) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urban shower | Time-decay | C₀=50, Cₜ=20, t=2 hr | 0.4581 | Derived from measured concentration drop. |
| Well-mixed layer | Ratio | W=500000, R=5 mm/hr, H=1000 m | 0.0025 | Useful for fast sensitivity checks. |
| Light drizzle | Ratio | W=200000, R=1 mm/hr, H=800 m | 0.0009 | Lower rainfall reduces removal rate. |
Rain and cloud processes remove gases and aerosols through wet deposition. Many air‑quality models approximate this as first‑order removal, where concentration falls exponentially during precipitation. This calculator turns common observations into a scavenging coefficient (Λ), summarizing how effectively rainfall cleans the air.
Λ is a removal rate per unit time: larger Λ means faster washout. Under constant Λ, the remaining fraction after time t is exp(−Λt). Real storms are not perfectly steady, so Λ is best interpreted as an event‑average value for comparison across cases.
Λ is reported in 1/s and 1/hr. Strong washout can reach tenths per hour, changing concentrations within hours, while drizzle can be much smaller. Values depend on pollutant solubility, particle size, temperature, and drop size spectra. A convenient interpretation is half‑life = ln(2)/Λ, the time for concentration to halve under the same conditions.
With two measurements, use the time‑decay method. Enter C₀ at the start, Cₜ after a known duration, and the time unit. The calculator applies Λ = (1/t)·ln(C₀/Cₜ). This is useful for field campaigns, chamber tests, or validating model output during storms.
Without concentration data, the scavenging ratio method uses Λ = (R·W)/H. R is precipitation rate, W is the scavenging ratio (rain concentration divided by air concentration), and H is an effective mixing height for a well‑mixed layer. Rainfall is converted to m/s internally.
Λ scales linearly with rainfall in the ratio model: doubling R doubles Λ if W and H stay fixed. Λ decreases as mixing height grows because pollutant mass is distributed through a deeper layer. These relationships help compare convective bursts versus stratiform rain.
For time‑decay, confirm Cₜ < C₀ and consider other drivers such as emissions, transport, or chemistry. For the ratio method, W varies by species, solubility, and particle size, often by orders of magnitude. Treat Λ as a practical indicator, not a universal constant.
Scavenging coefficients support storm cleansing comparisons, parameter tuning in dispersion models, and interpretation of monitoring drops during rainfall. Exporting to CSV enables event libraries, while PDF printing documents assumptions and results for reports, quality reviews, and stakeholder communication. It also helps estimate recovery time after short emission spikes during rainy periods.
It summarizes how rapidly rainfall removes a pollutant from air. Larger values mean faster wet removal and shorter persistence during a storm, making it useful for comparing events and testing model assumptions.
Use time‑decay if you have two concentration measurements and a duration. Use the scavenging ratio method when you know rainfall rate, scavenging ratio, and an effective mixing height for a well‑mixed layer.
The exponential model assumes net removal during the interval. If Cₜ is higher, emissions, transport, or chemistry likely increased concentrations, so Λ derived from ln(C₀/Cₜ) would not represent wet scavenging.
Any consistent unit works because the decay method uses a ratio C₀/Cₜ. For the ratio method, W is dimensionless by definition, rainfall is entered with selectable units, and mixing height is in meters.
Half‑life is the time required for concentration to drop by 50% under the same Λ. Short half‑life indicates strong storm cleansing; long half‑life suggests weak removal or light precipitation.
Not always. Rain intensity, droplet sizes, and boundary‑layer mixing can change during events. Treat Λ as an average over your chosen time window, and avoid mixing periods with very different storm regimes.
Yes, but parameter meaning differs. Gases with high solubility and fine particles often scavenge more efficiently than coarse or hydrophobic species. Choose W and H values that match your pollutant type and study context.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.