Compute dose rate from source output, distance, and shielding. Generate clear reports with unit conversions and summaries. Download exports for consistent documentation and reviews.
The absorbed dose rate at a target distance is estimated from a known output at a reference distance using geometric spreading and a transmission term:
For shielding, choose one transmission model:
Equivalent dose rate is approximated as Ḣ ≈ Ḋ × wR. For most X-ray applications, wR is commonly 1.
| Output at ref | dref (cm) | dtarget (cm) | Shield model | Transmission T | Estimated dose rate (mGy/h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.0 mGy/h | 100 | 200 | None | 1.000 | 1.500 |
| 12.0 mGy/h | 100 | 150 | HVL, n=1 | 0.500 | 2.667 |
| 2.5 mGy/min | 100 | 300 | None | 1.000 | 16.667 |
| 8.0 mGy/h | 100 | 250 | Exponential | 0.740 | 0.947 |
| 20.0 mGy/h | 100 | 100 | HVL, n=3 | 0.125 | 2.500 |
Example values are illustrative only; use calibrated measurements where possible.
X-ray dose rate expresses how fast dose accumulates at a location. Facilities often document air kerma rate or absorbed dose rate, then estimate equivalent dose using a radiation weighting factor. For X-rays, wR is commonly 1 for planning and documentation.
Begin with a measured output at a known distance, such as 100 cm from the focal spot. Use commissioning or survey measurements that match the same beam setting and filtration. If your value is in mGy/min, convert to mGy/h by multiplying by 60.
When geometry is approximately point-like, dose rate falls with the square of distance. Moving from 100 cm to 200 cm lowers the estimate to about one quarter. The calculator applies (dref/dtarget)² to support quick comparisons during workflow planning and room checks.
Shielding is captured by a transmission factor T between 0 and 1. With a known linear attenuation coefficient μ and thickness t, use T = e−μt. If guidance is provided in half-value layers, use T = (1/2)n after n HVLs for an approximate reduction. Use published material tables where available, and verify that units and beam quality match your situation.
The overall model multiplies a reference output by a distance factor and a transmission factor. An extra multiplier can represent occupancy, collimation changes, or conservative margins. Keeping each factor visible helps reviewers and auditors understand how assumptions influence the final number.
Total dose over a task is dose rate times exposure time. This tool converts mGy/h to mGy/min and multiplies by minutes. For example, 0.900 mGy/h becomes 0.015 mGy/min, so a 10‑minute task totals 0.150 mGy before applying wR. Tissue weighting is not applied in this report.
Record the measurement date, detector type, calibration status, and beam setting used for the reference output. When using μ or HVL values, ensure they match beam quality and material. CSV and PDF exports make it easier to standardize reports across teams and inspections.
Simple models do not fully capture scatter, field size, backscatter, or leakage paths. Treat results as an engineering estimate and validate with measurements when decisions are safety-critical. Always follow your local radiation protection procedures and documentation requirements.
1) What should I enter as “output dose rate”?
Use a measured air kerma or absorbed dose rate at a known distance, preferably from a calibrated survey meter or commissioning data for the same beam setting.
2) Why does distance reduce the dose rate so much?
For a point-like source, radiation spreads over a growing spherical area. The intensity therefore drops approximately with the square of distance, which is why doubling distance gives roughly one quarter dose rate.
3) When should I use exponential attenuation versus HVL?
Use exponential attenuation when you know μ at the beam energy and material. Use HVL when shielding guidance is provided as half‑value layers and you only need an approximate transmission after a certain number of layers.
4) What does the “extra transmission multiplier” represent?
It is a flexible factor to capture practical effects such as partial beam coverage, occupancy assumptions, collimation changes, or a conservative reduction for safety planning. Keep a note explaining why you used it.
5) Is mGy the same as mSv for X-rays?
They are different quantities, but for X-rays the radiation weighting factor is commonly 1, making absorbed dose in mGy numerically comparable to equivalent dose in mSv for planning, without tissue weighting.
6) Does this calculator include scatter and leakage?
Not explicitly. The model focuses on distance and a simple transmission term. Scatter and leakage can be significant in real rooms, so confirm with a survey when results influence shielding or workflow decisions.
7) What is a good way to validate the results?
Compare a predicted dose rate at a few distances with survey meter measurements under the same settings. Adjust assumptions if discrepancies appear, and document the final method used for repeatability.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.