Audit mobile speed using weighted vital scorecards. Review thresholds, grades, trends, and action-ready recommendations instantly. Download clean reports and compare sample results before deployment.
Enter mobile field or lab values, then calculate an overall mobile readiness score.
| Sample Page | LCP (s) | INP (ms) | CLS | FCP (s) | TTFB (s) | Speed Index (s) | TBT (ms) | Weight (KB) | Requests |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Homepage | 2.10 | 170 | 0.06 | 1.50 | 0.62 | 2.90 | 150 | 1320 | 46 |
| Category Page | 2.95 | 230 | 0.09 | 2.00 | 0.88 | 4.20 | 260 | 1760 | 69 |
| Blog Post | 3.70 | 310 | 0.18 | 2.60 | 1.20 | 5.30 | 420 | 2480 | 102 |
It estimates mobile page health using Core Web Vitals, supporting performance metrics, and delivery factors like payload size, requests, caching, and compression.
No. It is a decision-support score for technical review. It helps prioritize fixes, but it does not represent an official search ranking formula.
Field data is better for real user experience. Lab data is still useful for debugging, testing templates, and tracking changes before deployment.
They are the main Core Web Vitals. The calculator gives them more influence because they represent loading, responsiveness, and visual stability.
Heavy pages and high request counts often slow mobile loading. They also increase CPU work, network delay, and rendering pressure.
Yes. Run it once per page, save the CSV outputs, and compare the scores, metric statuses, and top priorities across templates.
Aim for 90 or above while also passing LCP, INP, and CLS. A high score without a CWV pass still needs attention.
Start with the metric causing the worst score, then reduce JavaScript, optimize images, improve caching, and remove blocking resources.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.