Understanding Decision Rules
A decision rule turns a hypothesis test into a clear action. It states when evidence is strong enough to reject the null hypothesis. The rule uses the significance level, the direction of the alternative hypothesis, and the selected test distribution. This calculator helps you compare a test statistic with the correct rejection region.
Why the Rule Matters
A test can feel confusing without a rule. The same statistic may lead to different actions when alpha, tail type, or degrees of freedom change. A right tailed test checks unusually large values. A left tailed test checks unusually small values. A two tailed test checks both extremes. The calculator shows these regions before you interpret the result.
Critical Value Method
The critical value method builds a cutoff from alpha. If the statistic falls inside the rejection region, reject the null hypothesis. For a z test, the cutoff comes from the standard normal curve. For a t test, it also depends on degrees of freedom. For a chi square variance test, the cutoff is not symmetric.
P Value Method
The p value method measures how extreme the observed statistic is under the null hypothesis. A small p value means the data would be unlikely if the null were true. When the p value is less than or equal to alpha, reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, fail to reject it.
Practical Interpretation
Statistical decisions should be written with care. Rejecting the null does not prove the alternative with certainty. Failing to reject the null does not prove the null is true. It only means the sample did not provide enough evidence at the chosen alpha level. You should also review sample size, assumptions, and study design.
Using This Tool
Choose the test model first. Enter sample values, alpha, and tail direction. The calculator can compute z, t, proportion z, and chi square variance statistics. You may also enter a manual statistic. After submission, read the decision rule, critical value, p value, and conclusion together. This gives a stronger and more transparent testing summary. Good inputs matter. Use a planned alpha level. Avoid changing tails after seeing data. Record assumptions. Share both methods when reporting important results. Keep raw calculations for review.