Estimate seepage losses for lined and unlined canals. Compare Darcy, coefficient, and percentage loss methods. Plan lining upgrades and save water across projects today.
| Scenario | Method | Length (m) | Wetted Perimeter (m) | k (m/s) | Δh (m) | d (m) | Loss Rate (m³/s) | Daily Loss (m³/day) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlined reach, sandy silt | Darcy | 1000 | 8.5 | 1.0×10⁻⁶ | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.005667 | 489.60 |
| Lined reach, moderate leakage | Coefficient | 1200 | 7.8 | — | — | — | 0.001872 | 161.74 |
| Preliminary audit, measured inflow | Percentage | 2000 | 9.0 | — | — | — | 0.125000 | 10800.00 |
Seepage is often the largest hidden loss in open conveyance. Even small rates accumulate: a loss of 0.002 m³/s equals 172.8 m³/day, enough to irrigate several hectares depending on crop demand and application efficiency.
Use the Darcy option when soil permeability and a representative head gradient can be estimated. Typical hydraulic conductivity ranges from 1×10⁻⁹ m/s (clay) to 1×10⁻⁴ m/s (clean sand), while silts commonly fall near 1×10⁻⁷ to 1×10⁻⁵ m/s. The coefficient method suits lined canals where leakage behaves like an average “area‑based” rate verified from inspections or monitoring for reliable planning outputs.
Interface area A = P×L drives the calculation, so measure wetted perimeter carefully at the operating water level. In Darcy seepage, the gradient i = Δh/d is sensitive: doubling the assumed flow path thickness halves the loss rate. For audits, split long canals into reaches with different soils and lining conditions, then sum results. When data is uncertain, test a low, expected, and high input set to bound the outcome.
Report seepage as m³/s per km and as m³/day. This supports benchmarking between projects and seasons. Combine daily loss with operating hours to estimate total volume over a week, month, or rotation. If you enter a water value (currency per m³), the calculator converts volume loss into an estimated financial impact for payback comparisons against lining and rehabilitation costs.
Common controls include compaction, clay blankets, geomembranes, shotcrete, and concrete lining. Maintenance also matters: joint cracks, animal burrows, and vegetation roots can increase leakage rapidly. Use periodic flow measurements and groundwater observations to update inputs, validate assumptions, and prioritize rehabilitation where the saved volume is highest.
It is the length of canal boundary in contact with water at the operating depth. Measure it from the cross‑section using the waterline that represents normal flow conditions.
Use Darcy when you can estimate soil permeability and a head gradient. Use the coefficient option for lined reaches with observed leakage behavior. Use percentage when you only have inflow and an audit‑level loss estimate.
Seepage is proportional to the contact surface through which water can leak. Multiplying wetted perimeter by length approximates the total interface area along the canal reach.
Enter the number of hours the canal carries water for the period you want to evaluate. For a continuous day, use 24 hours. For rotational supply, enter the actual running hours.
Use lining thickness for lined canals, or an effective seepage path through embankment/foundation for unlined canals. When uncertain, test a reasonable range to see sensitivity.
This is intended for planning and comparison. Final design should use calibrated parameters from field tests, seepage monitoring, and geotechnical interpretation, including boundary conditions and groundwater levels.
Improve lining integrity, seal joints and cracks, control burrowing animals, remove invasive roots, and compact embankments. Track performance with periodic flow checks and update the inputs to confirm savings.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.