Plan formwork support with clear load breakdowns fast. Adjust areas lifts bays and standards easily. Download results reduce risk and document site decisions properly.
The estimator separates dead loads (concrete + formwork + added dead) from variable loads (live + equipment + workers + point loads). Then it applies factors for design checks.
Fresh concrete and temporary construction actions can create short-duration peak demands that exceed finished-floor assumptions. This estimator starts with supported area so you can compare planning loads across bays, decks, and pour sequences, then scale totals consistently.
For staged placements, check the largest active footprint and any material stockpiles near edges. Localized stacking, hose reactions, and crew clustering can govern leg demand even when average area load appears acceptable.
Concrete dead load is calculated as density multiplied by thickness. Normal-weight concrete is often around 24 kN/m³ (roughly 150 pcf). A 200 mm slab therefore contributes about 4.8 kN/m² before adding reinforcement, screeds, or toppings.
Formwork panels, joists, walers, and accessories add predictable dead load. Many projects also include embedded items or temporary edge protection. Enter these items as “Additional Dead Load” and “System Weight” so the base demand reflects your actual temporary works package.
Construction live loads vary by activity. Placing operations, finishing, and material staging can raise demands quickly. For small tools, a distributed equipment load is practical. For pallets, pump-line reactions, or bundled materials, use the concentrated load input to stress the leg grid.
Impact factors capture dynamic effects from moving loads, vibration, and placement actions. Distribution factors allow for uneven load sharing, imperfect plumbness, and local stiffness differences. The dead and live multipliers convert service totals into a factored design total for checking support capacity.
When you select the geometry method, the calculator builds an approximate grid from length, width, and spacing. A 10 m × 5 m bay at 1.5 m spacing yields about 36 legs. Tighter spacing reduces load per leg but increases setup time and components.
Each leg is checked against a design allowable derived from its rating divided by a capacity safety factor. The utilization percentage highlights margin. If utilization exceeds 100%, increase leg count, reduce point loads, revise factors, or confirm a higher-rated standard and ledger configuration.
Bearing pressure is computed as design load per leg divided by base contact area. The design allowable bearing is the site value divided by a bearing safety factor. If bearing fails, increase sole-board size, improve subgrade, redistribute legs, or use engineered foundations for temporary works.
Q1. What is the difference between service total and design total?
A. Service total summarizes unfactored loads for planning. Design total applies load multipliers, impact, and distribution to check leg capacity and bearing with a conservative margin.
Q2. When should I use a concentrated load instead of distributed equipment load?
A. Use concentrated load for pallets, stacked materials, pump-line reactions, or any item that bears on a small footprint. Use distributed equipment load for light tools and uniform staging.
Q3. How do I choose a reasonable impact factor?
A. Start near 1.05–1.15 for controlled placing and light vibration. Use higher values if loads move quickly, vibration is significant, or handling is rough. Match project temporary works criteria when available.
Q4. Why does bearing fail even when leg capacity passes?
A. A strong leg can still overload weak ground. Bearing depends on base area and soil allowable value. Increase base area with sole boards, improve ground preparation, or reduce design load per leg.
Q5. Is spacing the same as bay size?
A. No. Spacing is the distance between adjacent legs in the grid. Bay size is the overall supported length and width. Smaller spacing increases legs and lowers load per leg.
Q6. What inputs most affect required legs?
A. Supported area, slab thickness, live construction load, and point load drive totals. Leg rating and capacity safety factor control allowable per leg, while distribution and impact factors raise the design demand.
Q7. Can I rely on this output for final sign-off?
A. Use it for preliminary sizing and documentation. Final designs should confirm layout, bracing, connections, eccentricities, uplift, and local requirements through qualified engineering review.
| Scenario | Area (m²) | Dead (kN/m²) | Live (kN/m²) | Legs | Leg rating (kN) | Design total (kN) | Load/leg (kN) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Light slab pour | 30 | 5.1 | 2 | 24 | 20 | 330 | 13.8 |
| Typical floor bay | 50 | 5.3 | 2.5 | 36 | 20 | 565 | 15.7 |
| Higher live activity | 50 | 5.3 | 4 | 49 | 20 | 770 | 15.7 |
| Small deck, tight grid | 20 | 5 | 2.5 | 25 | 15 | 250 | 10 |
| Heavy equipment staging | 60 | 5.4 | 3 | 64 | 25 | 980 | 15.3 |
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.