Size piping tees with minor loss results. Choose flow path, units, and realistic material data. See head loss instantly, then download reports for records.
Estimate tee head loss for piping systems quickly. Compare standard factors or enter custom values easily. Export results, document assumptions, and reduce design errors today.
| Scenario | Units | Flow | Diameter | Tee | K | Number | Typical total head loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chilled water run tees | SI | 25 m³/h | 100 mm | Standard run | 0.60 | 2 | ≈ 0.17 m |
| Branch takeoff tees | SI | 18 m³/h | 80 mm | Standard branch (dividing) | 1.80 | 3 | ≈ 0.87 m |
| Hydronic header tees | US | 120 gpm | 4 in | Swept run | 0.30 | 4 | ≈ 0.28 ft |
Example head losses are illustrative and depend on velocity.
Tee fittings create separation and mixing that adds measurable resistance. In closed-loop hydronic or process lines, repeated tees can dominate the minor-loss budget. Quantifying head loss early helps confirm pump head, protect control valve authority, and avoid oversized equipment that wastes energy. It also improves bid accuracy when estimating pump power, pipe supports, and insulation loads.
K values depend on geometry, branch angle, flow split, and whether flow divides or combines. A straight-through run often has a lower K than a branch takeoff. Swept patterns reduce turbulence, while reducing tees can increase losses. When manufacturer data exists, prefer it over generic tables. If flow split is uncertain, bracket K using conservative and optimistic cases to bound design risk.
Some designers convert K into equivalent length so tees can be modeled like extra pipe. The calculator estimates Le using Le = (K/f)·D, where f is the Darcy friction factor for the prevailing Reynolds number and roughness. This supports quick checks in spreadsheet takeoffs and aligns with common hydraulic solvers. Equivalent length is especially helpful when creating schedules, where fittings are counted but network models are not yet built.
Inputs drive accuracy. Use true inside diameter for the selected schedule and lining, and select density and viscosity for operating temperature. If water quality or glycol percentage changes, update properties. Field verification can include differential pressure readings across a representative branch or confirming balancing valve positions. For noisy systems, also check for cavitation, air entrainment, or partially closed isolation valves that can mask fitting losses.
Document assumptions alongside results: tee type, flow path, K source, units, and number of fittings. Compare total minor losses against straight-pipe friction to identify sensitivity. During peer review, re-run key scenarios at minimum and maximum expected flow. Clear exported reports support submittals, commissioning, and future maintenance.
Tee loss is the added head loss caused by turbulence and flow separation in a tee fitting. It is commonly modeled with a K factor multiplied by velocity head.
Use run K when flow passes straight through the tee. Use branch K when flow turns into or out of the branch. Dividing and combining cases can differ.
Head loss scales with velocity squared. Increasing flow raises velocity, so the velocity head rises quickly and the tee loss increases nonlinearly.
Enter a custom K when you have manufacturer data, test results, or project standards that better represent your fitting geometry, reducers, and operating flow split.
Equivalent length is a convenient approximation tied to friction factor. It works well for early estimates, but detailed networks may prefer explicit K values at nodes.
Use the true inside diameter of the pipe where the tee is installed, accounting for schedule, lining, and corrosion allowance. Nominal size can mislead results.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.