Design efficient wind farm rows within constrained sites. Tune rotor-based spacing and orientation for access. Export results to share with planners and contractors easily.
| Site (m) | Buffer (m) | Rotor (m) | Spacing (Down/Cross) | Pattern | Turbines | Capacity (MW) | Annual Energy (MWh) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12000 × 7000 | 300 | 170 | 8D / 5D | Grid | 56 | 280 | 872,087 |
| 15000 × 9000 | 400 | 200 | 7D / 4D | Staggered | 105 | 525 | 1,548,000 |
Wind farm layout begins with a clear definition of developable land. A setback buffer accounts for property lines, roads, water bodies, and ecological exclusions. The calculator converts total site length and width into an effective buildable rectangle. This helps planners confirm whether spacing targets are feasible before investing time in detailed micrositing and environmental screening.
Spacing is expressed as multiples of rotor diameter to keep inputs consistent across turbine models. Downwind spacing influences wake recovery, while crosswind spacing supports crane pads, haul routes, and maintenance access. Typical early-stage values are 5D–10D downwind and 3D–6D crosswind, with higher values reducing wake losses but also reducing turbine count.
Grid layouts simplify roads and collection routing, but staggered rows can reduce direct wake overlap. The wind angle field provides a conservative fit adjustment when rows are not aligned with site axes. Use this field to test sensitivity: if a modest angle sharply reduces fit, consider rotating the array or re-shaping the developable boundary.
Annual energy is estimated from installed capacity, hours per year, and a net capacity factor. The net capacity factor applies a bounded wake-loss factor driven by spacing. This is a planning proxy, not a substitute for CFD or validated wake models. Use the wake-loss result to compare options consistently across scenarios rather than to finalize production guarantees.
Electrical collection costs can be material for construction budgets. The calculator provides a grid-based cabling estimate using neighbor-to-neighbor routing. Combine this with turbines per square kilometer to benchmark density versus similar projects. If density is high, validate turning radii, substation placement, and construction sequencing to avoid costly rework.
| Length (m) | Width (m) | Buffer (m) | Rotor (m) | Down/Cross | Pattern | Rated (MW) | CF (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12000 | 7000 | 300 | 170 | 8D / 5D | Grid | 5.0 | 40 |
| 15000 | 9000 | 400 | 200 | 7D / 4D | Staggered | 5.0 | 38 |
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.