Simple inputs convert weather exposure into carbonation depth and cover risk scores. Compare years, coefficients, and covers to support repair timing and budgeting better.
| Exposure | k (mm/√year) | Time (years) | Cover (mm) | Estimated depth (mm) | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indoor / dry | 2.0 | 10 | 30 | 6.32 | Low |
| Sheltered exterior | 4.0 | 15 | 25 | 15.49 | Moderate |
| Exposed exterior | 6.0 | 20 | 25 | 26.83 | High |
| Harsh urban/industrial | 8.0 | 12 | 35 | 27.71 | Moderate |
Values are illustrative for learning and scoping, not a substitute for testing.
This basic estimator uses a diffusion-based square-root relationship:
Tip: If the risk is elevated or high, consider confirmatory testing.
Carbonation lowers concrete pore-water alkalinity as carbon dioxide reacts with hydration products. When the carbonation front reaches steel, passive protection can reduce, raising corrosion probability under moisture and oxygen. Estimating depth versus time helps prioritize testing, maintenance, and repair budgets for exposed structural elements.
Many field observations show carbonation depth often grows with the square root of exposure time. This estimator applies x = k × √t, where x is depth in millimetres, t is time in years, and k condenses mix quality and environment into one coefficient.
Typical k values can range roughly from 1 to 10 mm/√year depending on cement type, water–cement ratio, curing, cracking, and exposure severity. Indoor and dry locations usually trend lower, while exposed urban or industrial sites with wetting–drying cycles may trend higher. Use site test results when available.
Cover is the protective thickness between reinforcement and the concrete surface. The calculator compares the estimated carbonation depth to cover to indicate how close the carbonation front may be to steel. The reach time is estimated with tcover = (cover/k)², useful for scoping inspection windows.
The risk label is a screening tool: “Low” when depth is well below cover, “Moderate” when it reaches about half the cover, “Elevated” when it approaches three‑quarters, and “High” once depth meets or exceeds cover. Local moisture conditions, cracking, and chloride exposure can shift real corrosion risk.
Consider an exterior wall with 25 mm cover and an estimated k of 6 mm/√year. At 20 years, the model gives x ≈ 26.8 mm, indicating the carbonation front may have reached cover. This suggests targeted testing, steel potential checks, and repair planning rather than relying on assumptions.
This is a basic estimator, not a design code check. It assumes a steady relationship and uses a single coefficient. Improve accuracy by calibrating k with phenolphthalein depth measurements on cores, documenting microclimate, and separating cracked versus uncracked zones. Keep units consistent and record inputs for traceability.
Use the depth, remaining cover, and reach time outputs to schedule inspections, define sampling locations, and justify durability interventions. CSV exports support asset registers and spreadsheets, while PDF reports help attach calculation assumptions to condition assessments. Combine this estimator with visual surveys and laboratory testing for decisions.
It bundles material quality and exposure severity into one value, expressed as mm/√year. Higher values generally indicate faster carbonation progress due to porosity, curing, cracking, or aggressive wetting–drying conditions.
Yes. The calculator converts days and months into years internally, then applies the square‑root model. For short durations, results are small and should be interpreted as scoping, not a final durability assessment.
Microclimate, concrete strength, curing, cement type, cracks, coatings, and sheltered areas can change carbonation rates. One coefficient cannot capture all variability, so field testing is recommended for critical structures.
It suggests the carbonation front may have reached reinforcement, reducing protection. Corrosion still depends on moisture and oxygen, but the situation typically warrants inspection, testing, and potential repair planning.
Use drawings, specifications, or cover meter readings. If values vary, model the lowest realistic cover for screening, then verify on site. Record the source of the cover value in the notes field.
Use caution. Prestressing steel can be more sensitive to corrosion and cracking patterns differ. Treat this as a preliminary screen and consult project requirements, testing data, and durability guidance for prestressed elements.
Calibrate when decisions affect safety, major repair costs, or service-life claims. Core sampling with carbonation depth measurement can provide site‑specific rates and improve confidence in scheduling interventions.
Use results wisely and validate with site testing always.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.